God vs Science: A Flawed Argument
If Anything, Science Confirms the Existence of a God
By: Fat Lester
March 17, 2010
DNA: Earth's Most Complex Computer-Code
What for all intents and purposes is a computer code thousands of times more elaborate than any written by humans (I'm talking about Deoxyribonucleic Acid) has been present long before documented human existence on earth and is the system through and by which evolution occurs.
Evolution Occurs Via DNA
Evolution is is the most prominent "argument" against the existence of a higher power, however it is founded and based upon the false premise that the creation and existence of that code is completely arbitrary. That assumption is more than just a stretch. The concept is among the most statistically improbably scenarios conceivable.
Sceience is NOT a Valid Argument Against God's Existence
All that said, science really has no argument against the existence of a God. If the argument does not consist of sound, fallacy-proof reasoning, it is an invalid and therefore a losing argument. If anything, the existence of DNA and the evolutionary process based upon bolsters the argument for the existence of a God, in that the likelihood of something that elaborate and "well thought-out" (for lack of a better term) could occur spontaneously is literally next-to-nothing.
I've never found science-based arguments against God persuasive in even the slightest regard, and the reason is that they are not the least but logically sound.
In the first three paragraphs of this post, I have resoundingly defeated the evolution-based argument against God's existence, and proceeded to turn it around in a persuasive and logically-sound manner. This entire post required very little effort because the argument is so weak.
If anyone disagrees, feel free to voice your opinions in the comments below.
Tags: Editorial, God, Other
Comment on "God vs Science: A Flawed Argument"
